Chapter XV – The Purpose of Christ – His Headship
[Christ] is the Image of the invisible God, Firstborn of every
creature, for in Him is all created, that in the heavens and that on the earth,
the visible and the invisible, whether thrones, or lordships, or sovereignties,
or authorities, all is created through Him and for Him, and He is before all,
and all has its cohesion in Him.
And He is the Head…
kai (AND) autos (HE) estin (HE-IS-BEING) he (THE)
kephale (HEAD)
We are Called in Christ
We have now meditated
upon various aspects of four of the six truths which can be grasped
concerning the time prior to creation’s inception. As a reminder:
1.
God – alone
2.
All in God
3.
The Creation of God’s Son
4.
All in Christ
5.
God chooses us in Christ
6.
The Pre-eonian gifts to the ecclesia
As we move into
Colossians 1:18, we would like to begin meditating on the final two points.
This is because we have now passed the hinge on which Paul’s argument
swings: the cross. We have observed the foundational reasons for the
efficacy of Christ’s cross, in His role as the Firstborn of every creature. It
is because all is created in Him, and has been created through Him
and for Him, and because all has its cohesion in Him, that
God ensures Christ’s cross to be a success. Thus, where He dies, we die,
and since He is roused, so too will all be roused. It is on this
binding premise – the creation of all established in the
Image of the invisible God – that all are positively impacted by the
cross.
Without verses 15-17,
verses 18-20 carry no weight. Without verses 18-20, verses 15-17 carry no
weight. We believe the two must be considered together, or neither lesson
can fully stick. Creation is grand, meticulous, finely crafted. Its scope
sweeps lightyears, a symphony of celestial bodies. God clearly has a dramatic
flair. Yet, for all its majesty, the act of creation is insufficient in
itself to reveal the heart of God. Reconciliation of creation is
just as important, to reveal the binding heart of God. For this, tragedy must ensue.
The solution God inevitably imparts must justify His use of such
tragedy, while educating us as to His heart and character (Eph. 1:17.)
Both creation
(exaltation) and reconciliation (high exaltation) attest to Christ and His
glories. The Image of God must also become the Complement of God. It is
one thing, we gather, for Christ to Simulate God. It is yet another for
Christ to know why He simulates God, and to what end (if such an
end is even possible.)
For this theme to become
most apparent, a new connection to the race must be established via the
cross – a premise on which Christ can safely wade through sin’s swamp and
rescue the bodies stuck in the mire. He must be able to traverse unjust domain
to nullify death.
For this, the ecclesia
which is His body is formed. The purpose of Christ is simply incomplete without
a meditation on His complement, His body, which is referred to as “the
ecclesia” by Paul. The title “Head of the body” is of no value if we are unable
to recognize the figure. Christ Jesus – in all His glories – is One individual.
We refer to Him as “Christ,” or, “Anointed.” Yet this is only an official
title, like “President” or “Prime Minister” (this is not truly fair, for Christ
is the Official’s title, but we digress.)
What we mean is this: the
purpose of Christ is not delegated solely to Jesus Himself. It is further
delegated to all Who are His “body,” the “ecclesia” who believes in
“the evangel of God,” as presented in detail in Romans 3:21-4:25. Though Christ
saves, His purpose encompasses assuming the roles for which
God has placed Him. This includes love, which requires a second
person (in this case, many parties.)
Therefore, brethren, the purpose
of Christ includes you.
You are integral to the
fulfillment of Jesus’ goals. Without you, the Christ – both Head and
body – are incomplete, and thus a moot point. All the pieces matter,
not merely a few. No matter how we may feel, or our circumstances
appear, we have been explicitly told our worth, and our place, at the
right hand of God.
On the Agenda
As we proceed into this
title, then, we wish to meditate on two subjects; first, the Head of
Christ, and the body of Christ. The points presented in God’s
Timeline XVII will be proven by elaboration upon the
Headship of Christ in this chapter. In the next, our complementary election and
role as the body of Christ will be fully realized and appreciated. We
will observe how both of these subjects indeed follow directly from Col.
1:15-17, and serve God’s goal: the reconciliation of the universe.
In this chapter, we will
not focus on “whether or not” Christ is our Head (for this is too easy, and we
like challenges,) but how His headship over all is
revealed to us: first by creation, then through opposition, then through
suffering, and finally through subjection and reconciliation. We will further
distinguish between Christ’s universal Headship and the present
heading-up of the called in Him. Specifically, we will show that Christ
is already Head over all by creation, but all are not yet headed up
in Him, and in the meantime He is given as Head to the body, the ecclesia,
first. The former belongs to
creation; the latter belongs to reconciliation.
We will conclude with the
revelation which is so briefly given as an epithet in Colossians 1:18 – that
Christ is Head of the body – that God’s allotment among the ecclesia (Eph.
1:18) is not a digression from Christ’s universal Headship, but the firstfruits
of its acknowledged success.
All Headed Up
The first secret revealed
to us in Ephesians concerns the will of God.
in all wisdom and prudence [God is] making known to us the secret of
His will (in accord with His delight, which He purposed in [Christ]) to have an
administration of the complement of the eras, to head up all in the
Christ -- both that in the heavens and that on the earth -- in Him in Whom our
lot was cast also…
One could spend a
lifetime meditating on the above portion of Paul’s first run-on in our present
administration. In Ephesians, the first use of the stem “HEAD,” kephale,
should always be kept in the forefront of our minds whenever it appears (nine
times in the prison epistles.) We wish to reflect on many aspects of this
sentence (most of which must be reserved for our inevitable concordant study of
Ephesians,) but for now, we wish to broadly survey the text in the Concordant
Version, in which the inflection and unity of the Greek is most accurately
conveyed.
And what a survey it is! Universal
in scope! Heavens (plural) and earth (Gen. 1:3) precludes any
life from being left “down” (“DOWN” appearing first in Eph. 1:4, in
“disruption” – as opposed to headed up.) As an apt demonstration
of the verb “to head up,” anakephalaioo, we may observe its other use in
Romans 13:9–
For this: “You shall not commit adultery,” “you shall not murder,”
“you shall not steal,” “you shall not testify falsely,” “you shall not covet,”
and if there is any other precept, it is headed up in this saying, in
this: “You shall love your associate as yourself.”
Such a clear
demonstration of the term’s force in use cannot be mistaken unless one intends
to subtract from the Son what His suffering is due. We read of all precepts
(at least those identified in a just law) to be summarized, headed
up, in one singular precept: to love our associate as ourselves.
Among the Hebrew
scriptures, the earliest illustration is provided for us in Genesis
2:10-14–
A stream was flowing forth from Eden to irrigate the garden; from
there it parted and became four headstreams. The name of the first one
is Pishon… The name of the second stream is Gihon… The name of the third stream
is Hiddekel… and the fourth stream, it is the Euphrates.
Each of these streams is thematically
relevant, though their figures are not immediately important. There is one
stream flowing from Eden to irrigate the garden, which then branches
off into four individual streams.
Both literally and
figuratively, then, a head as used in scripture is designed as a kind
of “hub,” from which all its deviations sprout. The four headstreams are
incomplete without the headwater; nor can the headwater be called such without
headstreams. Similarly, the precept “You shall love your associate as yourself”
is incomplete without the others; nor can the other precepts (“headstreams”) be
fulfilled apart from its source precept (“headwater.”)
So also, all must be
headed up in Christ. Without all, Christ cannot be the Head of
all. So also, without the Head, the purpose and function all cannot be
understood and appreciated. One must have a body to be a Head – and a
just body is subject to its Head.
Therefore, believers –
the ecclesia which is Christ’s body. We are the first of creation
to acknowledge this headship which Christ has over all other perceived “heads.”
As we read in Eph. 1:22-23–
[God] subjects all under [Christ’s] feet, and gives Him, as Head
over all, to the ecclesia which is His body, the complement
of the One completing the all in all.
As this
Head, Christ is given to His body – as a hand fits perfectly into a
glove, or a… well, you know. When we compare these verses – Eph. 1:10 and
1:22-23 – to Philippians 2:5-11, the picture becomes ever clearer. Christ is,
indeed, Head over all. But He was not named “Jesus,” that is,
“YHWH-Saviour” until His birth. The name YHWH-Saviour is now –
and at no time prior – above every name that is named, at any level of
creation (Eph. 1:20-21.)
For the purpose of our
study, then, we may present two different aspects of Christ’s headship: that of
His headship over all – an exalted glory established at creation (cf.
John 1:1-3, 17:5, Phil. 2:6,) and that of His headship over the ecclesia
specially (Eph. 1:20-23, 4:15, 5:23, Col. 1:18, 2:19.)
Distinguishing the Two
Christ is not “Head over
all” because He is Head of the body. These two roles are related, but
not interchangeable. We know that He does not assume the role of “Head of the
body” until after His death. His crucifixion is the premise on
which we are called; therefore, He could only become “Head of the body”
by means of His death.
As we just read in Eph.
1:22, He is already called “Head over all” when He is given to the body.
When we read of His headship over all, we must acknowledge that this is
because the all that was once in God was placed in Christ, and
came through Christ.
As with Philippians
2:5-11 and Colossians 1:15-20, then, we may acknowledge the complementary glories
of our Lord; one which comes with creation, exalted in the form of
God, and the other, which comes with reconciliation, high exaltation as
the Head of the Christ. The present administration draws comparison to both for
the sake of educating us as to our position in Him, and its
purpose.
After speaking of all celestial
blessings which are ours in Christ Jesus (Eph. 1:3,) Paul tells us that we were
chosen in Him before the disruption of the world (Eph. 1:4.) This is the
seminal stepping stone which builds to the great fact that all will be
headed up in Christ. A great contrast, then, may be drawn between those subjected
to Christ and those not subjected to Christ. Indeed, in almost every
reference to His headship, Paul mentions His subjection in tandem. We
read that Christ subjects all, before mentioning that He is Head over
all (Eph. 1:22.) The complement of the eras completes this subjection
(Eph. 1:10, 1 Cor. 15:25-28.) Even individually, Christ is called the Head of every
man – the premise on which Paul attests to His subjection of every
man (1 Cor. 11:1-3.)
The similarities between
these two roles are as important as their differences. The Headship of Christ
was only implemented because there came to be enemies who opposed it. At
no point during the eons does Christ relinquish this status. On the
largest scale, creation was established in Him and propped up in
Him – making Him the Head, and creation the body. This is a clean
figure, but unsatisfying for a revelation of the depths of God. Therefore, the
world as created in Genesis 1:1 is disrupted (Gen. 1:2, 2 Pet. 3:5-6,
Eph. 1:4.) To subject all, insubordination must be introduced.
Here, there is hardly a
rational disagreement which could be made, from Trinitarian and Socinian alike.
One cannot subject if One does not first experience the
opposition. You might as well expect one who just learned how to count to
properly solve a trigonometry question. Christ cannot refute the bitter
and sustained opposition to His headship if He is not present to sustain
it. Thankfully, the Trinitarian does not suffer this issue, but they do mar
the pattern – that Christ Himself has a “Head,” being God (1 Cor. 11:3.)
We quote our brother,
full of wisdom, Alan Reid, in his study, The Secret of Marriage. He
says, “The rousing of God’s beloved Son through the glory of the Father (Rom.
6:4,) and by the power of God (2 Cor. 13:4, Eph. 1:19-20,) and the vivifying
power of Christ as the Firstfruit (1 Cor. 15:22-23,) combine as the greatest
proof of and witness to Christ’s universal Headship.”
We love this quote – yet
in this study we are compelled to simplify and expand packed statements such as
these. Alan is correctly arguing that, if Christ were not Head over all to
begin with, His outward appearance would not have been voided, with a view
to demonstrate His mastery over death. Christ did not appeal to God by
election, or by nature of His sinlessness. He has been roused by the ability of
God, and has the power to give life (John 11,) even beyond the
reach of death, and expound upon that which His own spirit testified
(Luke 2:41-50, 1 Pet. 1:10-11,) well before the scene at Golgotha. He has a universal
Headship by way of creation, as with the streams in Genesis, and as
with the new creation inaugurated with the ecclesia. “Headship” is not provided
by any other method.
Thus the distinction between
the two may be readily asserted, and the points hitherto considered may be
restated thus: Christ is, and has always been, Head over all. All have
yet to be headed up in Christ, for all have not yet been called in Christ.
He has instead been given to the ecclesia, to complete the Christ
first.
The Underlying Problem
Mankind opposes Christ –
though we hardly understand why. We are compelled to stand against Him
because of an internal disdain which is not our own. We do not create a
hatred toward Him; we are born into sin’s domain and spend much of our walk
dismissing His glory and loathing His role. We either degrade Him to a position
of every other man, so as to remove His headship as the physical Source from
which our race was brought from, or deify Him to the extent that He is His
own God, so as to rip Him from His Head.
Yet it remains a fact
that mankind’s hostility is derivative, not inherently in us
(Gen. 1:27, Rom. 5:12.) The source of this enmity must be sought earlier than
Adam — in the prior celestial rejection of the One in Whom all stood. For this,
we must look farther back, to the disruption of the world.
Sin, as considered
elsewhere, means hamartia, to “MISS.” In regards to Paul’s evangel,
to sin is to miss His mark of righteousness (Rom. 3:20-26,
14:23.) Sin serves as the opposite of faith in Romans, and
directly relates to our actions. The disruption of the world is the
introduction of sin to the creation.
When we consider this,
along with Colossians 1:15-17 and Philippians 2:6, a startling truth becomes
clear: the disruption of the world stems from an opposition to the Image of
God. The headship of Christ had been opposed by the celestial
beings. This is more than the supposed “rebellion” of which Christendom
speaks. They claim that a rebellion occurred from a perfect angel named
“Lucifer,” who used the free will God gave him to lead “a third” of the heavens
into open rebellion against God. They further posit that God has been fighting
ever since to save some of creation from the clutches of the Satan.
God’s word does not
sustain such a farce. Satan is said to be a liar from the beginning (1
John 3:8.) He is never portrayed first as an angel; the passages often
used to “prove” this claim are unsatisfactory, since it is expected of man to
reason out new truth.
Our claim, in contrast,
does not contradict the scriptures. The faith of Christ was the only
manner of proving God’s righteousness; ergo none of creation had faith
toward God aside from Christ. The disruption of the world thrust all (aside
from the Original) into a jurisdiction of darkness (Col. 1:13.) With no way of
proving the value of Christ’s Headship, an “information war” of sorts
has ensued among the celestials for thousands of years, rooted in antagonism
toward His authority. This is reflected on the earth we walk on. The disruption
of the world, the effectual jurisdiction of darkness, the necessity for the
cross of Christ, founded upon the inclusion of all in Him, together
furnish our evidence for the opposition to and rejection of the Headship of
Christ. Such a case is much harder to disprove, given the various plain
statements from Paul which support such a conclusion.
The rebellion among the
celestial hosts, then, is not an unplanned event, seeing as the cross of
Christ was a foreknown conclusion by God before the disruption of the
world commenced (1 Pet. 1:20.) The repercussions of this – misery, chaos, and
evil – have been developed upon the earth, to our horror. Yet we are consoled
by the fact that this event was foreseen. God was not reactive, but proactive
by placing His Son as the Head of all before sin swept the universe.
The disruption is incited by the counsel of God’s will, for it is the
only way in which the will itself (the salvation of all mankind, and our
realization of the truth) and its secret (that all becomes headed up in
Him) can be accomplished.
Christ’s Headship Affirmed
We have no statement of
“reaction” from Christ concerning the disruption of the world. From what we do
know concerning His character in the scriptures, He would have been sorely
hurt by such animosity from His progeny, regretful and angered that He brought
forth such bitter fruit. Here is where His journey of faith begins, for
His faith is not limited to what He could not see on earth, but
concerning the righteousness of God He could not see among the celestials!
Yet faith itself – even a
just faith – cannot sustain Him in light of such an event forever. It is
difficult enough to face rejection from some family and some religious
men, who repudiate our calling by attempting to reproach the faithful
sayings which we proclaim (1 Tim. 1:15, 3:1, 4:10.) How much greater is the
suffering of the One Whose Headship is continually challenged by all
creation?
By considering the event from Christ’s perspective,
the ultimate tragedy becomes apparent. This event was clearly of the utmost
gravity for Him. All believers agree that His suffering on the cross is the ultimate
example of anguish. Yet when we acknowledge the entirety of our Lord’s existence,
this suffering takes on new depth and meaning. No longer is He suffering at the
hand of earthly principalities led by ambiguously angry and defensive
celestial beings, but facing the agonizing humiliation of all creation,
which has rejected His authority and place. When He cries, “My
God! My God! Why have You forsaken Me?” He is not solely crying in pain, or
referencing a Psalm, but calling to His Head for consolation amidst all enmity,
from all authority.
It is not until His rousing
that His headship is affirmed. It is the first and greatest affirmation
from His Head that He has acted righteously. Moreover, it is this act
that enables the prophesied evangel of God to be revealed (Acts 13:1-2,
35-38, Rom. 1:1-2, 16-17, 3:21-32.) Because of His death, grace is now
revealed to be a fundamental characteristic of God. And through His faith, righteousness
is now revealed to be the Cause of grace (Rom. 3:21-24.) With this
message, God began to assemble the body of Christ, which is the
ecclesia.
God’s Allotment Among the Saints
In the first Ephesian
prayer, we read this beautiful compound expression:
I do not cease giving thanks for you, making mention in my prayers
that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may be giving you a
spirit of wisdom and revelation in the realization of Him… for you to perceive…
the riches of the glory of the enjoyment of His allotment among the saints…
Paul typically writes
these kinds of sentences, which serve as mini word-puzzles for us. The only
true way to solve it is by working backwards, like so:
1.
Among the saints
2.
Of His allotment
3.
Of the Enjoyment
4.
Of the glory
5.
The riches
In doing so, we grasp the
full scope of the phrase. We wish specially to stress His allotment. This
term is not in reference to our allotment, though this is often
supposed. The saints (that is, us,) are being acted upon in
this expression, by the nominative God. For fans of the Greek, the term
“saints” is written in the dative case, to indicate the direction the
allotment is toward. This is in contrast to a passage such as Romans
8:16-17, where “saints” (“children,” in the text) are in the nominative case,
to indicate that believers are the subject who partake of the
allotment.
Therefore, while it is
true that believers are indeed partaking of Christ’s allotment of
all, we insist that Ephesians 1:18 is not teaching this same point, or
the nominative case would refer again to the saints, and we would be
reading again of our allotment, not His.
God’s Son was, from
the beginning, appointed enjoyer of the allotment of all (for one cannot
enjoy those He was never present for.) The allotment of God among
the saints, however, is a special allotment. These two also should not
be interchanged, or we again lose the force of the terms. His allotment
refers to that special ecclesia chosen in Christ before sin made its
entrance (Eph. 1:4.) Oh, that we may competently speak before the One Who
composes such a progression! That to Christ was elected a group of people to know
Him most intimately when He fulfills His responsibility as the Kinsman
Redeemer – and all this before creation was estranged from Him.
This ecclesia, unlike the
Israelites, were called before the disruption of the world. Israel’s
special calling was to be called from the disruption of the world. Now,
no one in Christ should presume that God did not fine tune every detail
of His plot before it commenced. How, then, are we to rationalize the two
quotes, if not in light of the audiences for which they are intended? Israel’s
allotment is necessitated by sin; to restore the earth from its corrupted
position on a national scope, while its King restores the earth on an
individual scope. This is as far as their evangel enables them to see.
For us, meantime,
we are justified, and conciliated – therefore our journey to be brought
into the deepest recesses of the heart of God is active (Rom. 5:5, Eph. 1:17-18.)
We are invited to view the story, not from the terrestrial supremacy of
Israel, but from the birds-eye view of God Himself. From His perspective,
we are specially revealed to be elected from before the
disruption of the world, and have been prepared a spirit of wisdom to perceive such
a revelation, and its import.
The calling of the
ecclesia occurs in spirit, but on stage, on the earth. Christ does not invite
a relationship which meditates upon His sufferings among the celestials. It is from
the celestials that repudiation of the headship of Christ originated –
nor are any prepared to feel such a connection. The ecclesia is repeatedly said
to be called from the nations. How fascinating that we are chosen before
the need for nations themselves were apparent?
This election paved the
way for God’s allotment among the saints – itself the body of Christ, of
which Jesus is the Head. As we are discussing in our Romans study, and have presented
in God’s
Timeline, God planned for two administrations – the eighth
and the ninth – to call out this ecclesia through Paul’s evangel, and
develop us into maturity through secret graces which were concealed
within Himself until Paul finally penned the prison epistles (Eph. 3:8-9.)
What may we conclude, in
light of all of the information presented in our studies thus far? That the
ecclesia is God’s tenancy. Whereas in the Old Testament, the “dwelling
place” of God was the tent of appointment, and the first and second temple, here
through faith, to account us righteous, God makes us His dwelling place
(Rom. 8:11,) and slowly reveals the full extent of the life of the Son of His
love to us, now in Christ.
Let us maintain Christ’s
perspective, then: one that is consoled by the very existence of
the ecclesia!
The ecclesia is God’s
affirmation to the Son that the animosity from creation will not last, for God
has been reversing it among the called. Since we were elected before sin’s
advent, Christ, through faith, had the earnest (or “pledge”) of the enjoyment
of His allotment of all! He had this affirmation before Satan
ever challenged him.
And we are the first to
highly exalt Him, to ACKNOWLEDGE His place and right. Our realization of Him is
proof that the love of God is poured out in our hearts, and that Christ will
receive all that He suffered for. No longer are we ignorant to the Image of Love,
but are the first to come to terms with the Outward Appearance of our
Creator.
* * *
The topic of Christ’s
existence at creation is so divisive that it has created a critical rift
among the mature and the immature – so much so that some in both camps
are willing to scorn God’s calling of the other. To the immature, who do not
yet recognize Christ’s headship at the creation of all, this topic is not
important on the grounds that it “does not affect our salvation.” This
unfortunate reasoning places the focus squarely on the ecclesia –
effectually neglecting Christ’s say and view of the matter. Man cannot
appreciate Christ as our Head if we view Him solely as the Means of salvation. The
only reason His role, as Head of the ecclesia, is of any value is because
He is Head over all.
The mature in the
ecclesia have indeed come to terms with this glorious truth of Christ’s headship.
Of course, we entreat all who understand the points made thus far to have patience
with the immature – not at the cost of truth, but for the sake of
it. We are not meant to wield a truth we now have – as if the Headship
of the Firstborn of every creature is a means of piety. We know that it is an
abiding pledge of the universal acknowledgement of Him (Phil. 2:9-11,
Col. 1:18.) It is not merely that this is, but what this entails.
Therein lies the
connection between “The Character of Christ” and “The Purpose of Christ.” The
two are complementary; Christ rules with His characteristic humility. This
One, Head over all, voided His outward appearance, taking up a frail,
soilish frame molded for death. God demonstrates His humility – and therefore bestows
upon Him the ecclesia, to begin knitting the body – His own allotment – into
reality. Salvation, in Paul’s argument, is
not an isolated, singular act of rescue detached from creation, but the procedural
reclaiming of what was first established in Him. Therefore, if Christ is not
antecedent to creation, He may be imagined as a helper or appointed champion,
but not as the One in Whom all stands, through Whom all coheres, and to Whom
all must finally be headed up.
We are thus prepared for
a consideration of the body, the ecclesia crafted through Paul’s evangel.
In the next chapter, we will reflect on the ecclesia, the complement of
Christ’s headship, and thus round out the purpose of His headship over
the ecclesia as we progress into the secret of the reconciliation of all
creation.
- GerudoKing
Comments
Post a Comment